Ƶ

An open access publication of the Ƶ
Summer 2008

The concept of the cosmopolitan in Greek & Roman thought

Author
Anthony Arthur Long
To æ岹ܲ issue
Author Information

A. A. Long, a Fellow of the American Ƶ since 1989, is Irving G. Stone Professor of Literature, Professor of Classics, and Affiliated Professor of Philosophy and Rhetoric at the University of California at Berkeley. His publications include “Language and Thought in Sophocles: A Study of Abstract Nouns and Poetic Technique” (1968), “Stoic Studies” (1996), and “Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life” (2002). He has edited “Problems in Stoicism” (1996), “The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy” (with J. M. Dillon, 1988), and “The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy” (1999). He is a Corresponding Fellow of the British Ƶ.

Cosmopolitan, the English equivalent of the older French word cosmopolite, derives from the ancient Greek term kosmopolites (kosmos plus polites) to signify “citizen of the world.” The original Cynic philosopher Diogenes of Sinope (c. 390–323 B.C.), notorious for his “in your face” discourse and readiness to do everything in public, probably coined this expression and first applied it to himself.1 “Citizen of the world” suited Diogenes’s stance of flouting local conventions in order to demonstrate their lack of grounding in what he took to be the pre-cultural norms of human nature. In light of the hundreds of individual Greek city-states, highly jealous of their autonomy but also Panhellenic in many of their customs and collective sense of superiority to the “barbarians,” citizenship of the world must have originally seemed a profoundly paradoxical, even nonsensical concept.

Diogenes was a younger contemporary of Plato (alleged to have called Diogenes “Socrates gone mad”) and much the same age as Aristotle.2 With its dropout lifestyle, Diogenes’s Cynicism never became a school with a formal curriculum. Its leading adherents left a prominent mark on Hellenistic literature through their sardonic criticism of conventional values, but Cynicism more or less died out as an independent movement and was absorbed into Stoicism until it underwent a revival in the Roman Imperial period.

.  .  .

Endnotes

  • 1Diogenes’s use of the expression is attested in the biography of him composed by Diogenes Laertius (fl. c. A.D. 200) in his Lives of Eminent Philosophers, book 6, section 63. This biography (hereafter DL) is the best source for the life and thought of the Cynic Diogenes. On the Cynics in general, see Robert B. Branham and Marie-Odile Goulet-Cazé, The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and its Legacy (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1996).
  • 2DL, 6.54.
To read this essay or subscribe to æ岹ܲ, visit the æ岹ܲ access page
Access now
Previous Essay
Paths to a more cosmopolitan human condition
Next Essay
Rousseau, the anticosmopolitan?
To æ岹ܲ issue